Gregory Z Pack - 3560 - 3950cu in |
|
$168.95
Free shipping on this product!
Buy Z Pack - 3560 - 3950cu in at Backcountry |
 |
| The Gregory Z pack 3560-3950cu in subscribes to the theory that light is right, but that there is a right light. Stick with what you need, and get rid of what you don't. But if the pack can't carry its own, it doesn't matter how light it is, now does it? This way of thinking earned the Z Pack Backpacker Magazine's Best Weekender Award in their 2004 Gear Guide. The Z Pack shrinks down for the shortest of trips, and even sheds an additional 9 ounces with a removable framesheet and stay. But it also handles a 40-pound load with ease during a weeklong trip through Utah's Wasatch Mountains. With a sewn-in Sport harness and Gulwing Plus waistbelt, it's not just a lightweight sack. Instead, the Z Pack is loaded with these lightweight conveniences: top and side access for easy access to every nook and cranny; a generous front bucket pouch; and a second front pocket and top pocket, both with water resistant zippers. Stuff this pack full, but don't be surprised if you forget you have it on. Three different sizes available. |
Gregory Z Pack - 3560 - 3950cu in |
Bottom Line: This pack might be light in weight, but it's no lightweight. |
Reviews:
Gregory Z Pack
I have read several reviews of the z pack, most of which have been positive.Well, I've tried the "z" (men's medium)and here are my likes and dislikes:Likes: 1. Nice sized main compartment, held most of my 3 season gear.2. Bucket pocket and rear zipperd pouch.3. Roomy top pocket4. Weigth, 3lbs. 2oz.5. Hydration sleeve6. Materials seem solid enough for its weightDislikes:1. Suspension can not be adjusted2. Too many staps, but no bottom compression straps3. Overall fit and comfort Do to the lack of adjustment, I could not find a size that fit me comfortably. I normally wear a size medium, but the med. Z was too small and the large was too big. Both sizes were basically uncomfortable in the my lower back, and shoulders. I could not effectively transfer the weight (30lbs.)to my hips without feeling alot of pulling on my shoulders. I ended up returning the Z pack and found what I was looking for in the Granite Gear Nimbus Latitude. In my opinion, this pack is far superior to the Z pack. It weighs 1/2 lb. more but sports a wonderfully comfortable suspension, user friendly pack system, and bomber construction.
A Pack for 30 lbs.
I used my Z Pack on a four day 36 mile trip in the Rae Lakes loop in Kings Canyon Nat. Park. The biggest problem I had was getting the mandatory Bear canister into the pack along with everything else that had to go into the pack. I don't think that any of the pack manufacturers think about getting a bear canister into the pack. Also, I am 5'8" tall and the Med. size pack seemed to have too small of a frame for me. I think I should have bought the large size. Gregory claims that the pack can carry up to forty lbs. but I feel that would over load the hip and shoulder pads. 30 lbs. seemed to be the max I would want to carry in the pack.
Gregory Z Pack
Nice product. Used it everyday as a day pack on a two week trip in Utah. Fits well. Holds gear nicely. Comfortable and well constructed. Only time will tell if it will hold up and if I will still like it a year from now.
Great Lightweight Pack
I took this pack with about 29 pounds overnight in the Timpanogoos. It was great. It held the load nicely and it allowed me to take what I needed. This is one of the finest lightweight packs out there that can carry a large load.
A Very Good Pack
This is my second backpack. I own a Gregory Shasta for the long hauls, but wanted a weekend/3 day bag, as this is the usual trip nowadays. I have used this pack on a half-dozen outings so far and love it, combining it with lightweight sleeping bag, pad, tent, and stove. I come in at around 30lb with water and a few extras. I love the freedom a light pack gives me. Last fall, when I used this pack for a rainy adventure in the south Siskiyous of Oregon, I pushed the weight a little over 40lb and I met its limit. The pack was uncomfortable. Otherwise, within its design limits, the Z-pack is a great, versatile pack. I love the lid compartment, side entry and outer cargo netting. A rugged, practical, comfortable pack that got me where I was going in style, with energy to spare at trails end--something this 57-year-old backpacker finds increasingly important when sharing the trail with mates 20 years my junior.
|
